The Impact of AI Tools on Adolescent Learning: A New Study from Sweden
Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain
The emergence of AI tools, such as ChatGPT, has sparked a significant conversation regarding their place in education, with ongoing debates in schools and universities about whether these tools should be restricted or embraced.
In a recent study conducted in Sweden, researchers explored how adolescents’ executive functioning (EF) relates to their usage and perceived benefits of generative AI chatbots for academic tasks. The findings of this research are published in "Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence."
Key Findings About Executive Functioning
According to Johan Klarin, a school psychologist and research assistant at Lund University, students who face challenges with executive functioning may find AI tools especially beneficial for completing their assignments. "Students with more EF challenges found these tools particularly useful," Klarin explained, emphasizing the potential of AI to support those facing difficulties with cognitive skills integral to academic achievement.
However, the researchers also cautioned against overdependence on these tools, which could potentially impede the development of executive functioning skills and hinder learning. "This suggests a need for careful consideration when integrating AI support within educational settings, with a longitudinal approach to examining its effects," noted Dr. Daiva Daukantaitė, the lead researcher and associate professor at Lund University.
Perceived Utility of AI Tools
The researchers conducted two studies, the first involving 385 students aged 12 to 16 from four primary schools in southern Sweden, and a second involving 359 students aged 15 to 19 from a local high school. Results indicated that approximately 15% of younger students and around 53% of older students reported using AI chatbots for schoolwork. The researchers theorized that older students, faced with more complex assignments, tend to use these tools more frequently. Additionally, the increased popularity of AI use over time might have contributed to this rise.
Importantly, students with more EF challenges perceived AI tools as significantly more useful in their academic work. The study suggested that these students might experience greater enhancements in productivity compared to their peers.
Distinguishing Support from Cheating
Klarin highlighted the fine line between using AI tools as educational aids and engaging in academic dishonesty. "The distinction between cheating and using AI tools for support lies in the intent and manner of use," he stated. While employing ChatGPT to generate complete assignments is considered cheating, using it critically for research, brainstorming, and comprehension can serve as a valid educational resource.
Educators are encouraged to establish guidelines for responsible use. Teaching digital literacy and ethical considerations surrounding AI is imperative. The study suggests leveraging technology, fostering peer support programs, and equipping teachers with tools to assist students with EF challenges.
Maintaining Academic Integrity
This research provides foundational insights into the relationship between the use of AI tools in educational environments and executive functioning, proposing a balance between leveraging these technologies and preserving academic integrity.
"Our study lays the groundwork for informing educators, policymakers, and developers about the role of generative AI in education, highlighting the necessity of maintaining academic integrity while promoting authentic learning experiences," Dr. Daukantaitė concluded. She also acknowledged the limitations of the research, noting that self-reported data on AI usage and the specific educational context limit the generalizability of the findings.
More Information
For more insights on this study, refer to:
Johan Klarin et al, "Adolescents’ Use and Perceived Usefulness of Generative AI for Schoolwork: Exploring Their Relationships with Executive Functioning and Academic Achievement," Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence (2024). DOI: 10.3389/frai.2024.1415782.
Citation: AI tools like ChatGPT popular among students who struggle with concentration and attention (2024, August 28). Retrieved from Phys.org
This document is under copyright; reproduction is prohibited without permission. Content is for informational purposes only.
