Cross-Lingual Persona Effects in LLM Negotiation
Not provided in the content
Abstract
The study investigates whether the behavioral effects of persona instructions in LLM negotiations are consistent across languages, revealing significant differences in negotiation outcomes between English and Korean.
Reality Card
The study demonstrates that cross-lingual social-policy fidelity is not guaranteed, as negotiation outcomes significantly differ between English and Korean, particularly in terms of agreement rates and seller concessions.
Korean negotiations reached agreement 77.3% of the time compared to 52.5% in English, a 24.8-point gap.
The study's findings may not be generalizable beyond the specific languages and scenarios tested, limiting reproducibility in other contexts.
Paper to code
Verified implementation resources so builders can test the paper’s claims instead of stopping at the abstract.